Religious controversy of carbon dating bones

One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!

I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.

Dates up to this point in history are well documented for C14 calibration.

For object over 4,000 years old the method becomes very unreliable for the following reason: Objects older then 4,000 years run into a problem in that there are few if any known artifacts to be used as the standard.

He understood that archaeological artifacts were readily available.

If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).

Robert Whitelaw has done a very good job illustrating this theory using about 30,000 dates published in Radio Carbon over the last 40 years.

We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.

So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.

Search for religious controversy of carbon dating bones:

religious controversy of carbon dating bones-55religious controversy of carbon dating bones-71

And this big sequence is then used to 'correct' C14 dates. (3.) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without a knowledge of the exact ratio of C12 to C14 in the initial sample, the dating technique is still subject to question.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “religious controversy of carbon dating bones”